Let me explore the codebase first to understand what fundraising documents exist.

I've read all three docs. There are significant discrepancies across them. Let me reconcile everything and build the one-pager.

Now let me do a thorough reconciliation of every conflicting number across the three documents, then produce the final one-pager.

Discrepancy Report

Here's every conflict I found across the three docs:

Math check on round size vs. runway

The financial model states burn = $195K/mo post-hire, current cash = $420K:

The memo claims 18-month runway on a $2.5M raise — that math doesn't work at the stated burn. $3.0M is the only raise that lands near 18 months, which is what 2 of 3 docs claim. I'll use $3.0M / $28M cap as the reconciled ask.

Reconciled hiring: 5 hires

With $3.0M (not $3.5M), the 6-hire plan from the financial model is over-budget. The memo's 5-engineer plan fits. Current 14 FTE + 5 hires = 19 FTE post-raise. But the financial model's hiring plan lists 5 roles + 1 extra ("6 hires" in UoF but only 5 roles listed) — likely a typo. 5 hires is consistent.

Title reconciliation

The memo is newer but the pitch deck has co-founder designations. Priya as "CTO & Co-founder" is the stronger framing for investors. Jordan as "Head of Growth" is broader and better for a seed-stage one-pager. I'll use the pitch deck titles.

Now writing the final one-pager with all reconciled numbers.

Now let me write the assumptions document.

Done. Here's what I produced:

one-pager-final.md — the investor one-pager, ready to send after you verify a few items.

reconciliation-notes.md — internal-only doc with every discrepancy, the logic behind each resolution, and a checklist of things to confirm.

The 3 biggest conflicts you need to resolve before sending:

1. Round size ($2.5M / $3.0M / $3.5M) — I used $3.0M because it's the only number where the runway math actually works out to ~18 months at your stated $195K/mo burn. The memo's $2.5M only gives ~15 months, not the 18 it claims.

2. Valuation cap ($25M / $28M / $30M) — I used $28M (pitch deck). Confirm with Alex what's been communicated to leads.

3. Priya's title (VP Eng vs CTO & Co-founder) — These signal very different things to investors. The one-pager uses CTO & Co-founder; confirm which is accurate.

The reconciliation notes have a full checklist of 8 items to verify at the bottom. The ARR trajectory is also slightly off — $1.1M in Oct growing at 18% MoM should hit ~$1.3M in Nov, but the deck says $1.2M. Worth pulling the actual Stripe numbers.