The script doesn't print its results. Let me fix the call:

Here's your briefing — 6 papers on RAG for production systems, sorted by relevance:

RAG Architecture Review — arXiv Brief

1. Engineering the RAG Stack: Architecture and Trust Frameworks for RAG Systems

Focus: Comprehensive systematic review (2018–2025) consolidating RAG techniques into a unified taxonomy. Covers retrieval strategies, fusion mechanisms, orchestration, trust/alignment, and deployment of secure, domain-adaptable RAG systems. Why it matters: This is your anchor paper — a practical reference for production RAG architecture decisions.

2. FAIR-RAG: Faithful Adaptive Iterative Refinement for RAG

Focus: Agentic framework for multi-hop queries using Structured Evidence Assessment (SEA) — decomposes queries into evidence checklists, identifies gaps, and iteratively refines retrieval. Achieves SOTA on HotpotQA (F1 0.453, +8.3 pts over best iterative baseline). Why it matters: Directly addresses production failure mode of complex queries returning incomplete/noisy context.

3. EVOR: Evolving Retrieval for Code Generation

Focus: Dynamic RAG pipeline with synchronous evolution of queries and knowledge bases across diverse sources. 2-4x execution accuracy gains over static approaches (Reflexion, DocPrompting). Why it matters: Demonstrates the production need for living knowledge bases rather than static snapshots — relevant pattern for any domain with frequently updated data.

4. Riddle Me This! Stealthy Membership Inference for RAG

Focus: Security — demonstrates membership inference attacks against RAG datastores using natural-text queries (30 queries, <$0.02/doc). 2x TPR improvement while evading detection 76x better than prior attacks. Why it matters: Critical for production threat modeling. If you're deploying RAG over sensitive corpora, this paper outlines what adversaries can extract.

5. AR-RAG: Autoregressive Retrieval Augmentation for Image Generation

Focus: Patch-level retrieval at each autoregressive generation step (rather than a single static retrieval). Two frameworks: training-free (DAiD) and parameter-efficient fine-tuning (FAiD). Why it matters: While image-domain, the core insight — dynamic, step-level retrieval beats one-shot retrieval — transfers directly to text RAG pipeline design.

6. Automated Literature Review Using NLP and LLM-Based RAG

Focus: Compares frequency-based (spaCy), transformer (T5), and RAG (GPT-3.5-turbo) approaches for automated literature review. RAG achieves highest ROUGE-1 (0.364). Why it matters: Practical end-to-end RAG application benchmark; useful as a baseline comparison for document synthesis pipelines.

Key themes for discussion: iterative/adaptive retrieval vs. single-pass, knowledge base evolution, security/membership inference risks, and unified architectural taxonomies for production deployment.