product-manager-toolkit
Verifiedby sickn33 · Updated Apr 16, 2026
Essential tools and frameworks for modern product management, from discovery to delivery.
See It In Action
Let me explore the codebase first to find the relevant files, and load the PM toolkit skill.
Let me read all the input files and scripts in parallel.
Got everything. Let me run both scripts in parallel now.
Here's your afternoon planning pack:
1. Growth Feature Rankings (RICE, Q3 capacity: 15 person-months)
| Rank | Feature | RICE Score | Effort | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tiered pricing page w/ annual toggle | 20,000 | 0.5 mo | Quick Win |
| 2 | Slack integration for weekly digests | 5,760 | 1.0 mo | Quick Win |
| 3 | In-app referral program | 4,200 | 2.0 mo | Quick Win |
| 4 | Self-serve team onboarding wizard | 2,240 | 3.0 mo | Big Bet |
| 5 | AI-powered usage insights dashboard | 150 | 5.0 mo | Time Sink |
All 5 fit within Q3 capacity (11.5 / 15 used, 3.5 mo remaining). Portfolio is healthy: 3 quick wins, 1 strategic bet, and the AI dashboard scores as a time sink due to low confidence + high effort -- good candidate to defer or de-scope.
2. Churn Interview Summary -- Sarah Chen, Head of Ops @ Bridgevine Logistics
Account: 14-month tenure, 60-person ops team across 3 warehouses. Churned at renewal.
Sentiment: Mixed -- she genuinely valued the core product (workflow builder called "best-in-class") but the day-to-day experience drove her away.
Top pain points (by severity):
| Severity | Issue |
|---|---|
| CRITICAL | Mobile UX so bad the floor team stopped using checklists and reverted to paper. Adoption stalled at ~40%. |
| HIGH | Reporting only exports raw CSV -- team spent 2 hrs/week reformatting. Custom templates were promised but never shipped, eroding trust. |
| HIGH | API rate limits too low for ShipStation integration; engineering had to build a workaround queue. |
| MEDIUM | Onboarding assumed technical users; 3 weeks lost on workarounds. |
| MEDIUM | 20% price increase at renewal with no new features addressing their feedback -- couldn't justify spend to CFO. |
What would have saved the account: (1) Usable mobile experience, (2) Flexible reporting/API exports.
Churned to: ShipOps Pro -- won on mobile (big buttons, offline mode, barcode scanning). Their reporting is actually worse, but mobile usability was the deciding factor.
Competitor also evaluated: FlowRoute.
Key quote: "Product-market fit isn't just about the core feature -- it's about the whole experience. My team doesn't care about elegant conditional logic if they can't scroll a checklist on their phone."
3. PRD Format for #1: Tiered Pricing Page with Annual Toggle
Recommendation: One-Page PRD
Why it fits:
- Effort is XS (0.5 mo / ~2 weeks) -- right in the One-Page PRD sweet spot of 2-4 weeks
- Well-understood scope -- pricing page + toggle is focused, not exploratory
- No major cross-team dependencies -- design + frontend + billing, but no deep platform changes
- Low uncertainty -- tiered pricing with annual toggle is a known pattern
A Standard PRD would be overkill for a 2-week feature; a Feature Brief is too lightweight since this is ready to build, not validate. The One-Page format gives you Problem / Solution / Success Metrics / Scope / Requirements / Timeline / Risks on a single page -- enough structure to align eng and design without slowing down a quick win.
External Tools
| Tool | Type |
|---|---|
| python3 | binary |
Permissions
| Scope | Description |
|---|---|
| filesystem:read | |
| process:spawn |
SKILL.md
Product Manager Toolkit
Essential tools and frameworks for modern product management, from discovery to delivery.
Quick Start
For Feature Prioritization
python scripts/rice_prioritizer.py sample # Create sample CSV
python scripts/rice_prioritizer.py sample_features.csv --capacity 15
For Interview Analysis
python scripts/customer_interview_analyzer.py interview_transcript.txt
For PRD Creation
- Choose template from
references/prd_templates.md - Fill in sections based on discovery work
- Review with stakeholders
- Version control in your PM tool
Core Workflows
Feature Prioritization Process
-
Gather Feature Requests
- Customer feedback
- Sales requests
- Technical debt
- Strategic initiatives
-
Score with RICE
# Create CSV with: name,reach,impact,confidence,effort python scripts/rice_prioritizer.py features.csv- Reach: Users affected per quarter
- Impact: massive/high/medium/low/minimal
- Confidence: high/medium/low
- Effort: xl/l/m/s/xs (person-months)
-
Analyze Portfolio
- Review quick wins vs big bets
- Check effort distribution
- Validate against strategy
-
Generate Roadmap
- Quarterly capacity planning
- Dependency mapping
- Stakeholder alignment
Customer Discovery Process
-
Conduct Interviews
- Use semi-structured format
- Focus on problems, not solutions
- Record with permission
-
Analyze Insights
python scripts/customer_interview_analyzer.py transcript.txtExtracts:
- Pain points with severity
- Feature requests with priority
- Jobs to be done
- Sentiment analysis
- Key themes and quotes
-
Synthesize Findings
- Group similar pain points
- Identify patterns across interviews
- Map to opportunity areas
-
Validate Solutions
- Create solution hypotheses
- Test with prototypes
- Measure actual vs expected behavior
PRD Development Process
-
Choose Template
- Standard PRD: Complex features (6-8 weeks)
- One-Page PRD: Simple features (2-4 weeks)
- Feature Brief: Exploration phase (1 week)
- Agile Epic: Sprint-based delivery
-
Structure Content
- Problem → Solution → Success Metrics
- Always include out-of-scope
- Clear acceptance criteria
-
Collaborate
- Engineering for feasibility
- Design for experience
- Sales for market validation
- Support for operational impact
Key Scripts
rice_prioritizer.py
Advanced RICE framework implementation with portfolio analysis.
Features:
- RICE score calculation
- Portfolio balance analysis (quick wins vs big bets)
- Quarterly roadmap generation
- Team capacity planning
- Multiple output formats (text/json/csv)
Usage Examples:
# Basic prioritization
python scripts/rice_prioritizer.py features.csv
# With custom team capacity (person-months per quarter)
python scripts/rice_prioritizer.py features.csv --capacity 20
# Output as JSON for integration
python scripts/rice_prioritizer.py features.csv --output json
customer_interview_analyzer.py
NLP-based interview analysis for extracting actionable insights.
Capabilities:
- Pain point extraction with severity assessment
- Feature request identification and classification
- Jobs-to-be-done pattern recognition
- Sentiment analysis
- Theme extraction
- Competitor mentions
- Key quotes identification
Usage Examples:
# Analyze single interview
python scripts/customer_interview_analyzer.py interview.txt
# Output as JSON for aggregation
python scripts/customer_interview_analyzer.py interview.txt json
Reference Documents
prd_templates.md
Multiple PRD formats for different contexts:
-
Standard PRD Template
- Comprehensive 11-section format
- Best for major features
- Includes technical specs
-
One-Page PRD
- Concise format for quick alignment
- Focus on problem/solution/metrics
- Good for smaller features
-
Agile Epic Template
- Sprint-based delivery
- User story mapping
- Acceptance criteria focus
-
Feature Brief
- Lightweight exploration
- Hypothesis-driven
- Pre-PRD phase
Prioritization Frameworks
RICE Framework
Score = (Reach × Impact × Confidence) / Effort
Reach: # of users/quarter
Impact:
- Massive = 3x
- High = 2x
- Medium = 1x
- Low = 0.5x
- Minimal = 0.25x
Confidence:
- High = 100%
- Medium = 80%
- Low = 50%
Effort: Person-months
Value vs Effort Matrix
Low Effort High Effort
High QUICK WINS BIG BETS
Value [Prioritize] [Strategic]
Low FILL-INS TIME SINKS
Value [Maybe] [Avoid]
MoSCoW Method
- Must Have: Critical for launch
- Should Have: Important but not critical
- Could Have: Nice to have
- Won't Have: Out of scope
Discovery Frameworks
Customer Interview Guide
1. Context Questions (5 min)
- Role and responsibilities
- Current workflow
- Tools used
2. Problem Exploration (15 min)
- Pain points
- Frequency and impact
- Current workarounds
3. Solution Validation (10 min)
- Reaction to concepts
- Value perception
- Willingness to pay
4. Wrap-up (5 min)
- Other thoughts
- Referrals
- Follow-up permission
Hypothesis Template
We believe that [building this feature]
For [these users]
Will [achieve this outcome]
We'll know we're right when [metric]
Opportunity Solution Tree
Outcome
├── Opportunity 1
│ ├── Solution A
│ └── Solution B
└── Opportunity 2
├── Solution C
└── Solution D
Metrics & Analytics
North Star Metric Framework
- Identify Core Value: What's the #1 value to users?
- Make it Measurable: Quantifiable and trackable
- Ensure It's Actionable: Teams can influence it
- Check Leading Indicator: Predicts business success
Funnel Analysis Template
Acquisition → Activation → Retention → Revenue → Referral
Key Metrics:
- Conversion rate at each step
- Drop-off points
- Time between steps
- Cohort variations
Feature Success Metrics
- Adoption: % of users using feature
- Frequency: Usage per user per time period
- Depth: % of feature capability used
- Retention: Continued usage over time
- Satisfaction: NPS/CSAT for feature
Best Practices
Writing Great PRDs
- Start with the problem, not solution
- Include clear success metrics upfront
- Explicitly state what's out of scope
- Use visuals (wireframes, flows)
- Keep technical details in appendix
- Version control changes
Effective Prioritization
- Mix quick wins with strategic bets
- Consider opportunity cost
- Account for dependencies
- Buffer for unexpected work (20%)
- Revisit quarterly
- Communicate decisions clearly
Customer Discovery Tips
- Ask "why" 5 times
- Focus on past behavior, not future intentions
- Avoid leading questions
- Interview in their environment
- Look for emotional reactions
- Validate with data
Stakeholder Management
- Identify RACI for decisions
- Regular async updates
- Demo over documentation
- Address concerns early
- Celebrate wins publicly
- Learn from failures openly
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Solution-First Thinking: Jumping to features before understanding problems
- Analysis Paralysis: Over-researching without shipping
- Feature Factory: Shipping features without measuring impact
- Ignoring Technical Debt: Not allocating time for platform health
- Stakeholder Surprise: Not communicating early and often
- Metric Theater: Optimizing vanity metrics over real value
Integration Points
This toolkit integrates with:
- Analytics: Amplitude, Mixpanel, Google Analytics
- Roadmapping: ProductBoard, Aha!, Roadmunk
- Design: Figma, Sketch, Miro
- Development: Jira, Linear, GitHub
- Research: Dovetail, UserVoice, Pendo
- Communication: Slack, Notion, Confluence
Quick Commands Cheat Sheet
# Prioritization
python scripts/rice_prioritizer.py features.csv --capacity 15
# Interview Analysis
python scripts/customer_interview_analyzer.py interview.txt
# Create sample data
python scripts/rice_prioritizer.py sample
# JSON outputs for integration
python scripts/rice_prioritizer.py features.csv --output json
python scripts/customer_interview_analyzer.py interview.txt json
When to Use
This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
FAQ
What does product-manager-toolkit do?
Essential tools and frameworks for modern product management, from discovery to delivery.
When should I use product-manager-toolkit?
Use it when you need a repeatable workflow that produces text response.
What does product-manager-toolkit output?
In the evaluated run it produced text response.
How do I install or invoke product-manager-toolkit?
Ask the agent to use this skill when the task matches its documented workflow.
Which agents does product-manager-toolkit support?
Agent support is inferred from the source, but not explicitly declared.
What tools, channels, or permissions does product-manager-toolkit need?
It uses python3; channels commonly include text; permissions include filesystem:read, process:spawn.
Is product-manager-toolkit safe to install?
Static analysis marked this skill as low risk; review side effects and permissions before enabling it.
How is product-manager-toolkit different from an MCP or plugin?
A skill packages instructions and workflow conventions; tools, MCP servers, and plugins are dependencies the skill may call during execution.
Does product-manager-toolkit outperform not using a skill?
About product-manager-toolkit
When to use product-manager-toolkit
You want to rank feature requests using a RICE-style scoring workflow. You need to extract themes and pain points from interview transcripts. You want structured guidance for drafting PRDs and planning roadmap work.
When product-manager-toolkit is not the right choice
You need direct integration with external PM, analytics, or collaboration tools. You want a purely manual framework with no script execution.
What it produces
Produces text response.