prd
Verifiedby snarktank · Updated Apr 16, 2026
Generate a Product Requirements Document (PRD) for a new feature. Use when planning a feature, starting a new project, or when asked to create a PRD. Triggers on: create a prd, write prd for, plan this feature, requirements for, spec out.
See It In Action
Let me explore the codebase first, then ask a few clarifying questions.
Good context. The codebase already has a ref query param capture, a basic ReferralBanner, and a two-step signup flow — but the banner comment explicitly says "no interactive onboarding or guided flow yet." That's exactly the gap this PRD would fill.
A few questions so I nail the scope for tomorrow's estimation:
Waiting on your answers so I can draft the right PRD. Just reply with something like "1C, 2C, 3B, 4B" to keep it quick:
-
Goal — What's the primary goal of the referral onboarding widget?
- A. Convert referred signups — Maximize signup completion rate for users arriving via referral link
- B. Activate referred users faster — Post-signup onboarding tailored to referred users so they hit value quickly
- C. Both convert + activate — Full funnel: guide through signup AND a tailored first-run experience
-
Referral UX — What should the widget show about the referral benefit?
- A. Discount only — Make the 20% off deal more prominent and sticky throughout signup
- B. Discount + referrer info — Show discount AND who referred them (name/avatar) for social proof
- C. Discount + mutual benefit — Show what BOTH parties get (e.g. "You and Sarah each get 20% off")
-
Scope — What's the target scope for v1?
- A. MVP — widget only — Replace the basic green banner with a proper guided widget on signup. No new pages.
- B. Widget + post-signup steps — Widget on signup PLUS a referral-aware onboarding checklist after account creation
- C. Full flow redesign — Entire referred-user journey: landing page, widget, post-signup onboarding, reward tracking
-
Interaction model — Single-page or multi-step?
- A. Single-page inline — Persistent panel/card alongside the existing signup form
- B. Multi-step wizard — Step-by-step flow (See reward → Create account → Set up workspace)
- C. Collapsible sidebar — Slide-out panel showing referral context + progress alongside the form
Clear scope — MVP, inline widget, discount-focused, signup conversion only. Let me write the PRD now.
PRD saved to tasks/prd-referral-onboarding-widget.md.
Here's a quick summary of what's in it for your standup context:
Scope (MVP only):
- Replace the existing green text banner in
signup.tsxwith a properReferralWidgetcard - 2 files touched:
ReferralBanner.tsx(update/replace) +signup.tsx(swap banner, passstepprop) - No backend work, no new pages, no post-signup changes
4 user stories for eng to size:
- US-001: Conditional render based on
?ref=param - US-002: Widget UI — headline, discount copy, code badge
- US-003: Step-aware copy (form step vs. verification step)
- US-004: Remove old banner, one canonical referral component
Key open questions to resolve before estimation:
- Desktop layout — two-column (widget left, form right) vs. single-column stacked? Design needs to decide this before eng can estimate accurately.
- Confirm "20% off your first month" is still the correct discount copy.
- Should analytics events be in scope for v1?
Permissions
| Scope | Description |
|---|---|
| filesystem:write |
SKILL.md
PRD Generator
Create detailed Product Requirements Documents that are clear, actionable, and suitable for implementation.
The Job
- Receive a feature description from the user
- Ask 3-5 essential clarifying questions (with lettered options)
- Generate a structured PRD based on answers
- Save to
tasks/prd-[feature-name].md
Important: Do NOT start implementing. Just create the PRD.
Step 1: Clarifying Questions
Ask only critical questions where the initial prompt is ambiguous. Focus on:
- Problem/Goal: What problem does this solve?
- Core Functionality: What are the key actions?
- Scope/Boundaries: What should it NOT do?
- Success Criteria: How do we know it's done?
Format Questions Like This:
1. What is the primary goal of this feature?
A. Improve user onboarding experience
B. Increase user retention
C. Reduce support burden
D. Other: [please specify]
2. Who is the target user?
A. New users only
B. Existing users only
C. All users
D. Admin users only
3. What is the scope?
A. Minimal viable version
B. Full-featured implementation
C. Just the backend/API
D. Just the UI
This lets users respond with "1A, 2C, 3B" for quick iteration. Remember to indent the options.
Step 2: PRD Structure
Generate the PRD with these sections:
1. Introduction/Overview
Brief description of the feature and the problem it solves.
2. Goals
Specific, measurable objectives (bullet list).
3. User Stories
Each story needs:
- Title: Short descriptive name
- Description: "As a [user], I want [feature] so that [benefit]"
- Acceptance Criteria: Verifiable checklist of what "done" means
Each story should be small enough to implement in one focused session.
Format:
### US-001: [Title]
**Description:** As a [user], I want [feature] so that [benefit].
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- [ ] Specific verifiable criterion
- [ ] Another criterion
- [ ] Typecheck/lint passes
- [ ] **[UI stories only]** Verify in browser using dev-browser skill
Important:
- Acceptance criteria must be verifiable, not vague. "Works correctly" is bad. "Button shows confirmation dialog before deleting" is good.
- For any story with UI changes: Always include "Verify in browser using dev-browser skill" as acceptance criteria. This ensures visual verification of frontend work.
4. Functional Requirements
Numbered list of specific functionalities:
- "FR-1: The system must allow users to..."
- "FR-2: When a user clicks X, the system must..."
Be explicit and unambiguous.
5. Non-Goals (Out of Scope)
What this feature will NOT include. Critical for managing scope.
6. Design Considerations (Optional)
- UI/UX requirements
- Link to mockups if available
- Relevant existing components to reuse
7. Technical Considerations (Optional)
- Known constraints or dependencies
- Integration points with existing systems
- Performance requirements
8. Success Metrics
How will success be measured?
- "Reduce time to complete X by 50%"
- "Increase conversion rate by 10%"
9. Open Questions
Remaining questions or areas needing clarification.
Writing for Junior Developers
The PRD reader may be a junior developer or AI agent. Therefore:
- Be explicit and unambiguous
- Avoid jargon or explain it
- Provide enough detail to understand purpose and core logic
- Number requirements for easy reference
- Use concrete examples where helpful
Output
- Format: Markdown (
.md) - Location:
tasks/ - Filename:
prd-[feature-name].md(kebab-case)
Example PRD
# PRD: Task Priority System
## Introduction
Add priority levels to tasks so users can focus on what matters most. Tasks can be marked as high, medium, or low priority, with visual indicators and filtering to help users manage their workload effectively.
## Goals
- Allow assigning priority (high/medium/low) to any task
- Provide clear visual differentiation between priority levels
- Enable filtering and sorting by priority
- Default new tasks to medium priority
## User Stories
### US-001: Add priority field to database
**Description:** As a developer, I need to store task priority so it persists across sessions.
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- [ ] Add priority column to tasks table: 'high' | 'medium' | 'low' (default 'medium')
- [ ] Generate and run migration successfully
- [ ] Typecheck passes
### US-002: Display priority indicator on task cards
**Description:** As a user, I want to see task priority at a glance so I know what needs attention first.
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- [ ] Each task card shows colored priority badge (red=high, yellow=medium, gray=low)
- [ ] Priority visible without hovering or clicking
- [ ] Typecheck passes
- [ ] Verify in browser using dev-browser skill
### US-003: Add priority selector to task edit
**Description:** As a user, I want to change a task's priority when editing it.
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- [ ] Priority dropdown in task edit modal
- [ ] Shows current priority as selected
- [ ] Saves immediately on selection change
- [ ] Typecheck passes
- [ ] Verify in browser using dev-browser skill
### US-004: Filter tasks by priority
**Description:** As a user, I want to filter the task list to see only high-priority items when I'm focused.
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- [ ] Filter dropdown with options: All | High | Medium | Low
- [ ] Filter persists in URL params
- [ ] Empty state message when no tasks match filter
- [ ] Typecheck passes
- [ ] Verify in browser using dev-browser skill
## Functional Requirements
- FR-1: Add `priority` field to tasks table ('high' | 'medium' | 'low', default 'medium')
- FR-2: Display colored priority badge on each task card
- FR-3: Include priority selector in task edit modal
- FR-4: Add priority filter dropdown to task list header
- FR-5: Sort by priority within each status column (high to medium to low)
## Non-Goals
- No priority-based notifications or reminders
- No automatic priority assignment based on due date
- No priority inheritance for subtasks
## Technical Considerations
- Reuse existing badge component with color variants
- Filter state managed via URL search params
- Priority stored in database, not computed
## Success Metrics
- Users can change priority in under 2 clicks
- High-priority tasks immediately visible at top of lists
- No regression in task list performance
## Open Questions
- Should priority affect task ordering within a column?
- Should we add keyboard shortcuts for priority changes?
Checklist
Before saving the PRD:
- Asked clarifying questions with lettered options
- Incorporated user's answers
- User stories are small and specific
- Functional requirements are numbered and unambiguous
- Non-goals section defines clear boundaries
- Saved to
tasks/prd-[feature-name].md
FAQ
What does prd do?
Generate a Product Requirements Document (PRD) for a new feature. Use when planning a feature, starting a new project, or when asked to create a PRD. Triggers on: create a prd, write prd for, plan this feature, requirements for, spec out.
When should I use prd?
Use it when you need a repeatable workflow that produces text report.
What does prd output?
In the evaluated run it produced text report.
How do I install or invoke prd?
Ask the agent to use this skill when the task matches its documented workflow.
Which agents does prd support?
Agent support is inferred from the source, but not explicitly declared.
What tools, channels, or permissions does prd need?
It uses no extra tools; channels commonly include text; permissions include filesystem:write.
Is prd safe to install?
Static analysis marked this skill as medium risk; review side effects and permissions before enabling it.
How is prd different from an MCP or plugin?
A skill packages instructions and workflow conventions; tools, MCP servers, and plugins are dependencies the skill may call during execution.
Does prd outperform not using a skill?
About prd
When to use prd
When you need to define scope and requirements for a new feature before implementation. When a team needs a clear handoff document with goals, user stories, and acceptance criteria. When turning a rough feature idea into an actionable spec saved in the project workspace.
When prd is not the right choice
When you want the agent to implement the feature instead of writing requirements. When the task is only to brainstorm loosely without producing a formal PRD document.
What it produces
Produces text report.